|
Federal Local 387
|
|
|
What’s New?
What are the benefits of membership? One of our part time RNs was interested in becoming a member and asked what were the advantages to membership. Part of the question involved an inquiry of whether we provide a reduced rated on the dues structure. I thought the answer might answer some questions for other part timers as well as our full time RNs. I was asked to make a follow up contact with you about becoming a member of the local. Perhaps it would be best if I simply told you about some of the things we are doing or have done recently. It would take far too much time to explain all the benefits that you currently enjoy that are the results of union activity going back to the 1930's. The union is currently working on (translated it means bugging our Senators and Congressmen) getting part time RNs the same status as full times, that is - we are trying to get their "temporary" status changed to permanent - that would afford additional protections. We've negotiated guaranteed Holiday pay schedules (pt RNs were routinely abused with this in the past). We were able to push management into an agreement regarding mandatory OT problems which also addressed PT RNs suffering loss of wages in "OT-like" situations. The local negotiated the first agreement in the VISN on this issue. When it comes to scheduling problems, like certain flip backs (only eight hours between tours, yes, there is protection there, but many RNs don't realize them, particularly those who are not members.) We are the source for information about the conditions you work under. New managers frequently don't know your rights and the rules that govern your conditions of employment. We couldn't even begin to enumerate the violations we have dealt with because of unknowing or uncaring supervisors. When scheduling problems arise, we will sit down with the member and the supervisor and work out a legitimate solution. Essentially we will negotiate a situation for our member if we can. That type of representation is not required for non-members. Our only obligation is to see the nurse's rights under the provision of the contract are not violated. We use our direct line communications with service chiefs to influence benefits for first hand attention to our members' problems. We try to personalize the representational process. For our nonmembers, representation is limited to obligatory requirements. For members, we utilize resources that are not covered under the contract and only come from many years of a developed network of managers, from first-line supervisors to the facility director. When it comes to pro rating the dues, I would only ask you if you needed representation would you like the Union to prorate the service we provided? We go the extra mile for all our members, often providing additional support in other than contractual issues. Non-members will get what the law obligates us to provide them with. The bulk of the dues paid every two weeks go to the National level to support lobbying activities in Washington, D.C. - of the remaining monies, some is provided to the National VA Council who represents us within the National union. Our Sec/Treas. is also a Vice President on this council. We have for the last twenty plus years been able to maintain this position on the council. As a result of this effort our local enjoys some additional influences both nationally and locally. Over the past several years, attrition has slowly affected our local and our desire is now to actively pursue membership growth. We would like you to be part of that growth. I hope to hear from you soon. GT
How does one employee enjoy a better deal over another employee? A question posed to the local via e-mail had to do with differences in retirement benefits. The real answer is based in membership and the return for your investment (dues). Take a moment to read the Q and A below. Q: I was wondering if you knew that while our retirement is based on 1% x high 3 years x years worked the police and fireman of the VA are getting 1.7%? I find this quite unbelievable since we are dealing with the same "dangerous" people, in even more close quarters without a gun at that. Also, without us (nurses) they wouldn't even have a job at the VA unless they took care of the patients too. I think this is discrimination. I cannot believe we have just sat back all these years and allowed this to happen. What is the scoop on this? Thanks. A: Unfair - you're absolutely correct. My best guess as to why? - the firefighters, police and in this case Air Traffic controllers too, are consistently made up of highly unionized groups. When you organize and provide the funds through dues, the unions can influence the political powers. The 1.7% was initiated through some Senator's or Congressman's office. No small group or for that fact large group of unorganized people can provide a politician with the votes and donations that persuade him/her to introduce legislation like that. It takes money and voting blocks. At our facility, 100% of the cops and firefighters are union members. They are currently trying to organize a VISN collective and unify all the firefighters and police at Lyons, East Orange, Montrose, Castle Point, Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan and Northport into one representative group. That's organization that started at this facility. Nurse's membership at Northport has hovered around the 60% mark for years. This is almost twice the national average, but nowhere what you need in my estimation to drive the point home to the politicians that as a professional union we have the overwhelming support of those we represent. It the old adage - "United we stand, divided we fall" - membership is a driving force in the union's ability to represent and influence. Unfortunately, there are way too many nurses out there that just don't understand these basic principles.
Follow-up to Overtime regulation changes – The law passed almost 20 months ago was finally put into print as an amendment to VA Handbook 5011. If you wish to read it yourself it can be found through the Northport VA website under Employee Resources page, by clicking on the HR reference and click on the handbook reference. Look for 5011/9 (dated June, 15, 2006). It is a simple statement: i. Policy Against Certain Work Hours. Registered nurses on any work schedule shall not provide patient care in excess of 12 consecutive hours or in excess of 60 hours in any 7-day period, except in the case of nurses providing emergency care. This means you are not permitted to provide more than 12 hours of continuous direct patient care. When your relief calls in and the NOD says they can’t find anyone to relieve you, what do you do? That’s what we intend to discuss with Rosie Chatman and HR. It is obvious that policy is needed; it’s also obvious to us that it’s going to cost money. There is no longer any room for management to use the old “I guess you’ll just have to stay” routine. The local will give itself a pat on the back for seeing this law have some life breathed into it. Management (central office) had ignored its obligations, but a letter writing campaign by the Local to Senators Schumer and Clinton, Congressional Reps Israel, Bishop, McCarthy, King and Ackerman seems to have influenced the publication of the Handbook change published in mid-June. Since management (Northport) didn't offer up policy on this, the union did. The policy will be published within the next month. Most of you have seen what is in place based on a MOU (Memo Of Understanding). If you have questions, please call us at the office (ext. 2188) or email. Politically, who cares about you here at Northport? 18 months ago the unions joined together on a number of particular concerns. One of the upshots was to begin notifying the local elected officials who are supposedly representing us in Washington, D.C. When the local had an issue it wanted to bring up, both Senators and all five Congressional Representatives were contacted. We were pleased to find that both Senators responded on at least one issue each, but only two congressmen returned responses, those being Bishop and Israel. When you go to the polls remember who’s working for you. It’s your choice and your vote. As a federal local we do not come out in support of any candidate or political party, but we feel obligated to let our membership know who’s responsive. Partnership Council – year 3 The Partnership Council is about to celebrate its Third birthday. The group consists of 12 members, six each of management and union. The Partnership is not the place we work out differences over policy, rather it is the place we brainstorm to develop ideas that will benefit all employees. Important benefit items were recorded so all staff have access to this vital information via the Intranet connection. Working in conjunction with HR, Medical media and IRM the Council was able to bring froth this platform for information dissemination. As new programs develop, like the new dental/vision plan, we anticipate this new format being utilized. We were pleased to have the response we got to the Third annual Holiday Gala. Thnks to all of you who came and enjoyed the party. We are looking at the potential for a summer fest of some type, however this is in the draft stages and we will keep you informed as things progress. We look forward to your continued support and we are always looking for new ideas. Please contact us if you would like us to address an issue with the Partnership members. ************************************************** Knowing who has the ability to impact the policies and conditions we work under is important. to provide our members with a better understanding of the local process, here the players list. The Director, Associate Director, Chief of Staff and Associate Director of Patient Care Services are the BIG FOUR who set policy direction and tone. Ultimately it is the Director who initiates this process and the other three weave in their own influences. The Associate Director and Chief of Staff answers to the Director and the AD/PCS is directly beneath the COS in the chain of command. Despite this global influence from this group, it is Human Resources that monitors and controls the changes in much of the policy that exist at Northport. The Chief of HR and the Chief of Labor Relations interpret the tone of the "BIG FOUR" and put it into words. Since most employee benefits are in some way processed through the HR service, it becomes very clear the influences out of HR can be quite dramatic and can strongly influence the facility's operations. As a union that exclusively represents non-supervisory registered nurses at the facility, we are limited in our rights to negotiate. Our limitations are based on the potential impact on the employees we represent (Bargaining Unit Employees or BUEs) and very restrictive management rights about their rights to hire, fire and assign work. Many policies do not appear to cross into an area that we could negotiate, however they frequently fringe the areas of safety or work environment. Those are areas we will always visit to ensure the dangers to the BUEs is minimized or eliminated. NEWS - FACTS - OPINIONS by issue date April 2005 July 2005 September 2005
L-R AFGE Chief Steward K. Flannery, Congressmen Bishop and Israel, AFGE Pres. T. Frazier, NFFE Pres. G. Tangen, NFFE Sec/Tres. R. Thomesen, AFGE VP R. Sears On April 8, 2005, Officers, Reps and members met with Congressmen Bishop and Israel to discuss concerns over the operations at the Northport VAMC. See the follow up link in the April news.
|
|
Representing the Registered Nurses at Northport VAMC in New York |